In Queens, personal injury cases often turn on preparation, persistence, and a deep understanding of the borough’s courts and communities. This overview looks at the legal strategies and experience of Attorney Michael Reich in Queens, how he builds cases, where he focuses his practice, and why his client-first approach resonates with New Yorkers who need a steady advocate after a serious accident. Clients who search for ” Abogado Michael Reich” expect clarity and results: his work aims to deliver both.
Working with the team at Oresky & Associates PLLC, he concentrates on the nuts and bolts of case-building: evidence preserved early, medical narratives developed thoughtfully, and negotiation postures backed by trial readiness. The throughline is simple but demanding, do the work up front, and outcomes improve. The following sections break down how that plays out in real Queens matters, from construction falls to complex multi-party claims.
Professional background of Michael Reich in personal injury law
Attorney Michael Reich’s background is rooted in representing injured New Yorkers across Queens and the greater NYC area. His practice centers on plaintiff-side personal injury, guiding cases from intake and investigation through settlement negotiations and, when needed, trial. That end-to-end involvement means he sees how small decisions early on, like sending timely preservation letters or filing the right notices, can shape leverage months later.
He is experienced navigating Queens Supreme Court procedures, from compliance conferences in Jamaica to motion practice and jury selection unique to the county’s diverse venire. He also understands the interplay between New York’s No-Fault rules, serious injury thresholds, and liability standards that govern motor vehicle, premises, and construction claims. That fluency helps him convert facts into legal elements efficiently and spot issues, like municipal deadlines or Labor Law theories, that can dramatically expand recovery.
Colleagues describe his style as methodical and client-centered. He blends practical investigation with legal analysis, translating medical records into persuasive damages narratives and turning complex accident scenes into clear liability stories. Ongoing study of evolving New York case law, combined with hands-on work with experts and treating physicians, rounds out a background built for the realities of Queens litigation.
Areas of practice central to his Queens legal work
While personal injury is broad, Michael Reich’s Queens caseload typically anchors around several core areas:
- Construction and worksite accidents: New York Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) claims, ladder and scaffold falls, falling-object incidents, and jobsite safety lapses involving owners, general contractors, and multiple subcontractors. These cases often require rapid site documentation and expert analysis.
- Motor vehicle collisions: Car, truck, and rideshare crashes across the LIE, Van Wyck, Grand Central, and local streets from Astoria to Jamaica. He addresses No-Fault (PIP) benefits, the Insurance Law § 5102(d) serious injury threshold, and evidence issues like dashcam footage or event data recorders.
- Premises liability: Slip/trip-and-fall injuries, snow/ice neglect, building code violations, and negligent security at apartment buildings, supermarkets, and transit-adjacent properties throughout Flushing, Jackson Heights, and beyond.
- Municipal liability: Claims involving the City of New York, MTA/NYC Transit, Department of Education, and other public authorities. These matters demand strict compliance with General Municipal Law timelines, including Notice of Claim and 50-h examinations.
- Catastrophic injury and wrongful death: Brain and spinal injuries, loss of limb, severe orthopedic harm, and fatal incidents requiring careful damages development, life-care planning, and economic analysis.
These practice areas reflect the day-to-day risks Queens residents face, dense traffic, active construction, and heavily used public spaces, and they benefit from a lawyer who knows how to meet evidence challenges quickly and lawfully.
Strategic approaches to case preparation and litigation
Winning personal injury cases rarely comes from a single dramatic courtroom moment. It comes from consistent, strategic work. Michael Reich’s approach can be summed up in several pillars:
- Rapid response and preservation of evidence
- Early site inspections, photographs, and measurements, before conditions change
- Spoliation/preservation letters to property owners, contractors, and fleet operators for videos, maintenance logs, incident reports, and black box data
- FOIL requests to agencies (e.g., NYPD, DOT, MTA) for collision reports, bus videos, work permits, and roadway maintenance records
- Clear liability theories from day one
- In construction cases, analyzing which Labor Law sections fit the facts and which entities are proper defendants
- In premises matters, pinning down notice and code violations with inspections, weather data, and records
- In motor vehicle claims, securing witness statements, mapping sightlines, and obtaining vehicle telematics or rideshare records
- Medical narrative building that resonates
- Coordinating with treating providers to document objective findings, functional limits, and causation
- Using diagnostics and specialist opinions to bridge the gap between mechanism of injury and daily-life impact
- Tracking milestones, surgeries, PT plateaus, return-to-work efforts, to time demands when damages are clearest
- Expert deployment that fits the case
- Accident reconstructionists, biomechanical experts, and site-safety professionals for liability clarity
- Vocational experts, economists, and life-care planners to quantify lost earning capacity and future medical needs
- When appropriate, day-in-the-life visuals that humanize the injury beyond charts and notes
- Procedural precision, especially with public entities
- Calendar discipline for General Municipal Law Notice of Claim and 50-h examinations
- Early motion practice where it builds leverage (e.g., partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law 240(1))
- Readiness for mediation and, if necessary, trial, including motions in limine and jury selection strategy tailored to Queens jurors
- Negotiation anchored in proof, and trial readiness
- Settlement packages that don’t just list records but tell a coherent story with exhibits
- Mediations scheduled when damages documentation is mature, not rushed
- A credible willingness to try the case, which often separates strong offers from “take-it-or-leave-it” numbers
- Client communication that reduces surprises
- Plain-language updates, depo prep, and expectation setting about timelines and outcomes
- Bilingual communication where needed: many Queens families searching “Abogado Michael Reich” value counsel who can meet them where they are linguistically
This disciplined, Queens-focused strategy creates momentum. By the time a carrier or municipal authority evaluates the claim, the file reads like a trial outline, because it is.
Advocacy style reflecting dedication to injured clients
Clients don’t just hire a strategy: they hire a person. Michael Reich’s advocacy style is steady, detail-driven, and respectful of what injury does to a family’s routines and finances. He communicates in clear terms, preps clients thoroughly for depositions and medical exams, and pushes back when insurers overreach or minimize harms that are well-documented.
He’s also realistic. Queens cases can be complex, multiple defendants, language barriers, medical scheduling challenges at busy facilities like Elmhurst or Jamaica Hospital. He accounts for those realities without letting them slow the case. The goal is to keep pressure on the defense, keep clients informed, and keep evidence moving.
What clients often notice is the combination of empathy and firmness: check-ins about recovery paired with uncompromising attention to proof. That balance is what turns a file into a story a jury can understand, if it needs to go that far.
